Research

Is Everything Vibration? What Physics Actually Says

The honest answer to the poster slogan. Fields do oscillate and mass does have a frequency — but the famous Tesla quote is misattributed, and a frequency description is a lens, not automatically a substance. Separates the established physics from the slogan, then states where the framework makes a falsifiable claim beyond both.

Plain-language doorway · established + interpretive

Mass as Frequency: The Compton Effect and the Oscillation of Matter

Every massive particle oscillates internally at a rate proportional to its mass — the Compton frequency. An electron quivers at ≈ 2.47 × 10²⁰ Hz. This page covers the established physics (zitterbewegung, E = hf, λ = h/mc), where the Coherence framework extends it, and the one prediction that would falsify the extension.

Established physics + framework extension

Sub-quantum grid model — three prediction pipelines, one under review

Three complete data-analysis pipelines for predictions #15, #17, #18 — pair-production resonance peaks, GRB photon dispersion (#15, under review), and non-linear Shapiro delay in pulsar timing. Python source published; plots for #17 and #18, interactive bounds chart for #15.

Toolbox ready · awaiting full datasets

The Black Hole Information Paradox, read through the grid

Hawking says black holes destroy information; quantum mechanics says they cannot. A discrete grid turns the Page curve from a paradox into a near-triviality — a finite-dimensional, unitary system cannot lose information. Includes the analogue-gravity (BEC) experimental bridge and an honest stop: the argument is kinematic, not a dynamical solution.

Open · kinematic argument + analogue-gravity bridge

Occupied or Empty — a working hypothesis on matter, light and the substrate

A new, unproven part of the framework (September 2026): matter as occupied states with a phase, annihilation and pair production as occupation moving between matter and light, and a provisional choice for a random rather than fixed-lattice substrate — with its costs for older predictions. Each claim is checked against published measurements, and the versions that failed are listed too.

New working hypothesis · unproven · no predictions yet

Scientific Bridges — Spectrum vs established physics

Seven bridges placing each Coherence hypothesis next to the peer-reviewed physics it relates to: mass as stable oscillation, gravity as emergent envelope, resolution as a Planck-scale grain, entanglement as phase lock, consciousness as coherent EM field, vacuum ≠ empty, helix waves. Each bridge ends with an honest "what if" falsifier.

Methodological — convergent + open seams identified

Related Thinkers — a map of adjacent work

Researchers and pioneers whose work overlaps the framework, organised by tier — peer-reviewed (Popp, Becker, Davidson & Lutz, Schumann, Marzo, McFadden, Casimir), qualified outsiders, and historical conceptual pioneers (Tesla, de Broglie, Feynman, Bohm). The point is methodological transparency about lineage.

Reference map · no new claims